Review of Canon 5d Mark Ii Vs Sony A7s

PW, October eighteen, 2021

Catechism 5D Marking Two vs Sony A7

The Catechism EOS 5D Marker Two and the Sony Alpha A7 are two digital cameras that were officially introduced, respectively, in September 2008 and October 2013. The 5D Mark Ii is a DSLR, while the A7 is a mirrorless interchangeable lens camera. Both cameras are equipped with a total frame sensor. The Catechism has a resolution of 21 megapixels, whereas the Sony provides 24 MP.

Below is an overview of the primary specs of the ii cameras as a starting point for the comparison.

Bank check 5D Marking Two offers at
ebay.com
Check A7 offers at
ebay.com

Going beyond this snapshot of cadre features and characteristics, what are the differences between the Canon EOS 5D Marking 2 and the Sony Alpha A7? Which one should you lot buy? Read on to discover out how these two cameras compare with respect to their trunk size, their imaging sensors, their shooting features, their input-output connections, and their reception by expert reviewers.

Body comparison

The physical size and weight of the Catechism 5D Marking Two and the Sony A7 are illustrated in the side-by-side display below. The two cameras are presented according to their relative size. Three successive views from the front, the top, and the rear are shown. All width, height and depth measures are rounded to the nearest millimeter.

If the front view surface area (width x height) of the cameras is taken as an aggregate mensurate of their size, the Sony A7 is considerably smaller (31 percentage) than the Canon 5D Mark 2. Moreover, the A7 is substantially lighter (44 percent) than the 5D Mark II. In this context, it is worth noting that both cameras are splash and grit-proof and can, hence, be used in choppy weather conditions or harsh environments.

The above size and weight comparisons are to some extent incomplete since they exercise not consider the interchangeable lenses that both of these cameras require. Both cameras have similarly sized sensors, only DSLRs have a larger flange-to-focal aeroplane distance than mirrorless cameras, which imposes contraints on the optical technology process and by and large leads to bigger and heavier lenses. You can compare the optics available for the ii cameras in the Canon EF Lens Catalog (5D Marking II) and the Sony Fe Lens Catalog (A7). Mirrorless cameras, such every bit the A7, have moreover the advantage that they tin use many lenses from other systems via adapters, as they have a relatively brusque flange to focal aeroplane distance.

Apropos battery life, the 5D Mark Two gets 850 shots out of its LP-E6 battery, while the A7 tin can take 340 images on a single charge of its NP-FW50 power pack. The ability pack in the A7 can be charged via the USB port, which can be very convenient when travelling.

The table beneath summarizes the fundamental physical specs of the ii cameras alongside a broader set of comparators. In case you desire to display and compare some other camera duo, you can use the CAM-parator app to select your photographic camera combination among a big number of options.

Body Specifications

		Camera Model	Photographic camera Width	Camera Height	Camera Depth	Camera Weight	Battery Life	Conditions Sealing	Photographic camera Launch	Launch Toll (USD)	Street Price
1.		Canon 5D Mark Ii	152 mm	114 mm	75 mm	850 g	850	Y	Sep 2008	iii,499	ebay.com
two.		Sony A7	127 mm	94 mm	48 mm	474 g	340	Y	Oct 2013	1,699	ebay.com
three.		Catechism 1D Ten Marker 2	158 mm	168 mm	83 mm	1530 k	1210	Y	February 2016	v,999	ebay.com
4.		Canon 5D Mark IV	151 mm	116 mm	76 mm	890 m	900	Y	Aug 2016	3,499	amazon.com
five.		Catechism 5DS	152 mm	116 mm	76 mm	930 g	700	Y	Feb 2015	3,699	amazon.com
vi.		Canon 5DS R	152 mm	116 mm	76 mm	930 g	700	Y	Feb 2015	3,699	amazon.com
7.		Catechism 5D Marker Three	152 mm	116 mm	76 mm	950 g	950	Y	Mar 2012	3,499	ebay.com
8.		Canon 6D	145 mm	111 mm	71 mm	770 g	1090	Y	Sep 2012	two,099	ebay.com
ix.		Canon 1D X	158 mm	168 mm	83 mm	1551 1000	1120	Y	October 2011	6,799	ebay.com
10.		Canon 7D	148 mm	111 mm	74 mm	860 g	800	Y	Sep 2009	i,699	ebay.com
xi.		Canon 1Ds Marker 3	150 mm	160 mm	80 mm	1385 g	1800	Y	Aug 2007	7,999	ebay.com
12.		Canon 5D	152 mm	113 mm	75 mm	895 chiliad	400	Y	Aug 2005	3,299	ebay.com
13.		Sony A7 II	127 mm	96 mm	60 mm	599 g	350	Y	November 2014	1,999	ebay.com
fourteen.		Sony A7S	127 mm	94 mm	48 mm	489 g	380	Y	April 2014	2,499	ebay.com
15.		Sony A7R	127 mm	94 mm	48 mm	465 g	340	Y	Oct 2013	two,299	ebay.com
16.		Sony RX1R	113 mm	65 mm	lxx mm	482 g	270	n	Jun 2013	2,799	ebay.com
17.		Sony RX1	113 mm	65 mm	70 mm	482 g	270	n	Sep 2012	ii,799	ebay.com
Note: Measurements and pricing practise non include easily detachable parts, such as addition or interchangeable lenses or optional viewfinders.

The cost is, of course, an important cistron in any camera determination. The retail prices at the time of the photographic camera's release place the model in the market relative to other models in the producer'due south line-upward and the competition. The A7 was launched at a markedly lower toll (by 51 percent) than the 5D Mark Ii, which puts it into a unlike market place segment. Ordinarily, street prices remain initially close to the MSRP, simply subsequently a couple of months, the first discounts appear. Afterward in the production wheel and, in particular, when the replacement model is about to announced, further discounting and stock clearance sales frequently push the camera price considerably downwardly.

Sensor comparison

The imaging sensor is at the core of digital cameras and its size is one of the main determining factors of image quality. All other things equal, a large sensor will have larger individual pixel-units that offering better low-low-cal sensitivity, wider dynamic range, and richer color-depth than smaller pixels in a sensor of the same technological generation. Moreover, a big sensor photographic camera will give the photographer more control over depth-of-field in the prototype and, thus, the ability to better isolate a bailiwick from the background. On the downside, larger sensors tend to be associated with larger, more expensive photographic camera bodies and lenses.

Both cameras under consideration feature a full frame sensor, but their sensors differ slightly in size. The sensor expanse in the A7 is 1 per centum smaller. They however have the aforementioned format factor of 1.0. Both cameras have a native attribute ratio (sensor width to sensor height) of three:2.

Despite having a slightly smaller sensor, the A7 offers a college resolution of 24 megapixels, compared with 21 MP of the 5D Mark II. This megapixels advantage comes at the cost of a higher pixel density and a smaller size of the individual pixel (with a pixel pitch of 5.97μm versus half dozen.41μm for the 5D Mark Two). However, it should be noted that the A7 is much more than contempo (by 5 years) than the 5D Marking Ii, and its sensor volition accept benefitted from technological advances during this fourth dimension that make it possible to gather light more efficiently.

The resolution advantage of the Sony A7 implies greater flexibility for cropping images or the possibility to print larger pictures. The maximum print size of the A7 for good quality output (200 dots per inch) amounts to 30 x xx inches or 76.2 10 fifty.8 cm, for very practiced quality (250 dpi) 24 10 16 inches or 61 10 40.6 cm, and for first-class quality (300 dpi) 20 x xiii.3 inches or l.8 10 33.9 cm. The corresponding values for the Canon 5D Mark II are 28.1 x 18.vii inches or 71.3 x 47.5 cm for good quality, 22.5 x fifteen inches or 57.i 10 38 cm for very good quality, and xviii.7 x 12.5 inches or 47.five 10 31.vii cm for excellent quality prints.

The A7 has on-sensor phase detect pixels, which results in fast and reliable autofocus conquering even during alive view operation.

The Canon EOS 5D Mark 2 has a native sensitivity range from ISO 100 to ISO 6400, which tin exist extended to ISO 50-25600. The corresponding ISO settings for the Sony Blastoff A7 are ISO 100 to ISO 25600, with the possibility to increase the ISO range to 50-51200.

For many cameras, information on sensor operation has been reported by DXO Marking. This service determines an overall sensor rating, as well every bit sub-scores for low-lite sensitivity ("DXO Sports"), dynamic range ("DXO Landscape"), and colour depth ("DXO Portrait"). Of the 2 cameras nether consideration, the A7 offers substantially improve image quality than the 5D Mark Ii (overall score 11 points higher). The advantage is based on 1.1 bits higher color depth, two.3 EV in additional dynamic range, and 0.three stops in additional low light sensitivity. The tabular array beneath summarizes the physical sensor characteristics and sensor quality findings and compares them beyond a set of similar cameras.

Sensor Characteristics

		Camera Model	Sensor Grade	Resolution (MP)	Horiz. Pixels	Vert. Pixels	Video Format	DXO Portrait	DXO Mural	DXO Sports	DXO Overall
1.		Canon 5D Mark II	Full Frame	21.0	5616	3744	1080/30p	23.7	11.9	1815	79
ii.		Sony A7	Full Frame	24.0	6000	4000	1080/60p	24.viii	14.2	2248	90
iii.		Canon 1D X Mark II	Full Frame	20.0	5472	3648	4K/60p	24.1	13.5	3207	88
4.		Canon 5D Mark 4	Full Frame	30.1	6720	4480	4K/30p	24.eight	13.6	2995	91
5.		Canon 5DS	Total Frame	l.3	8688	5792	1080/30p	24.7	12.four	2381	87
6.		Canon 5DS R	Full Frame	50.3	8688	5792	1080/30p	24.6	12.iv	2308	86
7.		Canon 5D Mark 3	Full Frame	22.i	5760	3840	1080/30p	24.0	xi.seven	2293	81
8.		Canon 6D	Full Frame	20.0	5472	3648	1080/30p	23.8	12.1	2340	82
9.		Catechism 1D 10	Full Frame	17.nine	5184	3456	1080/30p	23.eight	11.8	2786	82
x.		Canon 7D	APS-C	17.nine	5184	3456	1080/30p	22.0	11.vii	854	66
11.		Catechism 1Ds Mark III	Full Frame	21.0	5616	3744	none	24.0	12.0	1663	fourscore
12.		Canon 5D	Full Frame	12.vii	4368	2912	none	22.9	11.1	1368	71
13.		Sony A7 II	Full Frame	24.0	6000	4000	1080/60p	24.9	13.half-dozen	2449	ninety
14.		Sony A7S	Total Frame	12.0	4240	2832	1080/60p	23.ix	13.two	3702	87
15.		Sony A7R	Total Frame	36.2	7360	4912	1080/60p	25.six	xiv.1	2746	95
16.		Sony RX1R	Full Frame	24.0	6000	4000	1080/60p	25.0	13.vi	2537	91
17.		Sony RX1	Full Frame	24.0	6000	4000	1080/60p	25.1	14.3	2534	93

Many modern cameras cannot simply take still pictures, but as well record videos. Both cameras under consideration have a sensor with sufficiently fast read-out times for moving pictures, simply the A7 provides a faster frame rate than the 5D Marking Two. It can shoot movie footage at 1080/60p, while the Catechism is limited to 1080/30p.

Feature comparing

Autonomously from body and sensor, cameras can and practise differ across a diverseness of features. For instance, the A7 has an electronic viewfinder (2400k dots), while the 5D Mark 2 has an optical ane. Both systems have their advantages, with the electronic viewfinder making it possible to projection supplementary shooting information into the framing view, whereas the optical viewfinder offers lag-complimentary viewing and a very clear framing epitome. The viewfinders of both cameras offer the same magnification (0.71x), but the one in the A7 has a wider field of view (100%) than the finder in the 5D Marker II (98%), so that a larger proportion of the captured paradigm is visible. The following table reports on some other primal feature differences and similarities of the Catechism 5D Mark Two, the Sony A7, and comparable cameras.

Core Features

		Camera Model	Viewfinder (Blazon or 000 dots)	Control Panel (aye/no)	LCD Specifications (inch/000 dots)	LCD Attach- ment	Touch on Screen (yes/no)	Max Shutter Speed *	Max Shutter Flaps *	Congenital-in Flash (yes/no)	Built-in Image Stab
1.		Canon 5D Mark II	optical	Y	3.0 / 920	fixed	n	1/8000s	iii.9/southward	northward	n
2.		Sony A7	2400	northward	iii.0 / 1230	tilting	northward	1/8000s	5.0/s	n	north
3.		Canon 1D X Marking II	optical	Y	3.2 / 1620	fixed	Y	1/8000s	16.0/s	n	north
4.		Canon 5D Mark 4	optical	Y	iii.2 / 1620	fixed	Y	ane/8000s	vii.0/due south	n	north
5.		Canon 5DS	optical	Y	iii.2 / 1040	fixed	northward	1/8000s	5.0/southward	northward	north
6.		Canon 5DS R	optical	Y	iii.2 / 1040	stock-still	n	1/8000s	five.0/s	n	due north
7.		Canon 5D Marker III	optical	Y	iii.2 / 1040	stock-still	n	ane/8000s	6.0/southward	n	n
8.		Catechism 6D	optical	Y	3.0 / 1040	fixed	n	1/4000s	4.5/south	n	n
9.		Canon 1D X	optical	Y	3.2 / 1040	stock-still	north	one/8000s	14.0/south	n	due north
10.		Canon 7D	optical	Y	3.0 / 920	stock-still	due north	1/8000s	8.0/south	Y	due north
xi.		Canon 1Ds Mark Three	optical	Y	three.0 / 230	fixed	n	ane/8000s	five.0/due south	n	n
12.		Canon 5D	optical	Y	two.5 / 230	fixed	n	1/8000s	3.0/southward	northward	north
13.		Sony A7 II	2400	northward	three.0 / 1230	tilting	northward	i/8000s	5.0/due south	n	Y
14.		Sony A7S	2400	n	3.0 / 921	tilting	northward	one/8000s	5.0/due south	north	n
15.		Sony A7R	2400	n	iii.0 / 1230	tilting	north	i/8000s	4.0/s	n	n
xvi.		Sony RX1R	optional	n	3.0 / 1229	fixed	n	1/4000s	five.0/south	Y	northward
17.		Sony RX1	optional	due north	3.0 / 1229	fixed	northward	1/4000s	five.0/south	Y	n
Notes: *) Information refers to the mechanical shutter, unless the camera just has an electronic one.

Ane feature that is nowadays on the 5D Marker II, but is missing on the A7 is a acme-level LCD. While beingness, of course, smaller than the rear screen, the control console conveys some of the essential shooting information and tin be convenient for quick and piece of cake settings verification.

The 5D Mark Ii writes its imaging information to Compact Flash cards, while the A7 uses SDXC or Retentiveness Stick PRO Duo cards.

Connectivity comparison

For some imaging applications, the extent to which a photographic camera can communicate with its environment can be an important aspect in the camera determination process. The table below provides an overview of the connectivity of the Catechism EOS 5D Marker Ii and Sony Alpha A7 and, in particular, the interfaces the cameras (and selected comparators) provide for accessory command and data transfer.

Input-Output Connections

		Camera Model	Hotshoe Port	Internal Mic / Speaker	Microphone Port	Headphone Port	HDMI Port	USB Port	WiFi Support	NFC Support	Bluetooth Support
1.		Canon 5D Mark Two	Y	mono / mono	Y	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-
ii.		Sony A7	Y	stereo / mono	Y	Y	micro	2.0	Y	Y	-
3.		Catechism 1D X Mark II	Y	mono / mono	Y	Y	mini	iii.0	-	-	-
4.		Catechism 5D Marking IV	Y	mono / mono	Y	Y	mini	3.0	Y	Y	-
five.		Canon 5DS	Y	mono / mono	Y	-	mini	3.0	-	-	-
6.		Canon 5DS R	Y	mono / mono	Y	-	mini	3.0	-	-	-
seven.		Canon 5D Mark Three	Y	mono / mono	Y	Y	mini	two.0	-	-	-
8.		Canon 6D	Y	mono / mono	Y	-	mini	2.0	Y	-	-
9.		Canon 1D X	Y	mono /-	Y	-	mini	two.0	-	-	-
10.		Canon 7D	Y	mono /-	Y	-	mini	2.0	-	-	-
11.		Catechism 1Ds Mark III	Y	mono /-	-	-	-	two.0	-	-	-
12.		Canon 5D	Y	- /-	-	-	-	2.0	-	-	-
13.		Sony A7 2	Y	stereo / mono	Y	Y	micro	2.0	Y	Y	-
fourteen.		Sony A7S	Y	stereo / mono	Y	Y	micro	2.0	Y	Y	-
fifteen.		Sony A7R	Y	stereo / mono	Y	Y	micro	2.0	Y	Y	-
xvi.		Sony RX1R	Y	stereo / mono	Y	-	mini	two.0	-	-	-
17.		Sony RX1	Y	stereo / mono	Y	-	mini	ii.0	-	-	-

It is notable that the A7 offers wifi support, which can be a very convenient means to transfer image data to an off-photographic camera location. In dissimilarity, the 5D Mark II does not provide wifi capability.

Studio photographers volition appreciate that the Canon 5D Marking II (unlike the A7) features a PC Sync socket, so that professional person strobe lights can be controlled past the photographic camera.

Both the 5D Mark II and the A7 accept been discontinued, but can regularly be found used on ebay. The 5D Mark II was replaced by the Canon 5D Marker III, while the A7 was followed past the Sony A7 2. Further information on the 2 cameras (e.grand. user guides, manuals), every bit well every bit related accessories, can be found on the official Canon and Sony websites.

Review summary

Then how do things add upwards? Which of the two cameras – the Canon 5D Marking II or the Sony A7 – has the upper hand? Is ane clearly meliorate than the other? The listing beneath highlights the relative strengths of the two models.

Reasons to adopt the Canon EOS 5D Mark Ii:

• Brighter framing: Features an optical viewfinder for clear, lag-free limerick.
• Easier setting verification: Features an LCD display on top to control shooting parameters.
• Longer lasting: Can accept more shots (850 versus 340) on a single bombardment charge.
• Better studio light control: Has a PC Sync socket to connect to professional person strobe lights.
• More heavily discounted: Has been available for much longer (launched in September 2008).

Arguments in favor of the Sony Blastoff A7:

• More than detail: Has more megapixels (24 vs 21MP), which boosts linear resolution past 7%.
• Amend image quality: Scores substantially higher (11 points) in the DXO overall evaluation.
• Richer colors: Generates noticeably more than natural colors (1.1 bits more than color depth).
• More dynamic range: Captures a broader range of light and dark details (2.3 EV of extra DR).
• Better video: Provides higher picture show framerates (1080/60p versus 1080/30p).
• Better live-view autofocus: Features on-sensor phase-detection for more confident autofocus.
• Ameliorate audio control: Has a headphone port that enables audio monitoring while recording.
• More framing info: Has an electronic viewfinder that displays shooting data.
• More complete view: Has a viewfinder with a larger field of view (100% vs 98%).
• More detailed LCD: Has a college resolution rear screen (1230k vs 920k dots).
• More flexible LCD: Has a tilting screen for odd-bending shots in landscape orientation.
• Faster outburst: Shoots at higher frequency (five vs iii.nine flaps/sec) to capture the decisive moment.
• More compact: Is smaller (127x94mm vs 152x114mm) and will fit more readily into a bag.
• Less heavy: Has a lower weight (by 376g or 44 per centum) and is thus easier to take along.
• Easier travel charging: Can be conveniently charged via its USB port.
• More than legacy lens friendly: Can use many non-native lenses via adapters.
• Easier file upload: Has wifi built in for automatic backup or image transfer to the spider web.
• Easier device pairing: Supports NFC for fast wireless prototype transfer over short distances.
• More affordable: Was introduced into a lower priced category (51 pct cheaper at launch).
• More modernistic: Reflects 5 years of technical progress since the 5D Mark II launch.

If the count of relative strengths (bullet points higher up) is taken as a measure out, the A7 is the clear winner of the contest (21 : five points). Notwithstanding, the relevance of individual strengths volition vary across photographers, so that yous might want to utilize your own weighing scheme to the summary points when reflecting and deciding on a new photographic camera. A professional wildlife photographer will view the differences betwixt cameras in a way that diverges from the perspective of a family unit photog, and a person interested in architecture has distinct needs from a sports shooter. Hence, the decision which camera is best and worth buying is oftentimes a very personal one.

5D Mark II₀₅ : ₂₁ A7

How nigh other alternatives? Do the specifications of the Canon 5D Mark Ii and the Sony A7 place the cameras amongst the pinnacle in their course? Find out in the latest Best DSLR Camera and Best Mirrorless Interchangeable Lens Photographic camera listings whether the 2 cameras rank among the cream of the crop.

In whatsoever example, while the comparing of technical specifications tin provide a useful overview of the capabilities of different cameras, it says little about, for instance, the shooting experience and imaging performance of the 5D Marker II and the A7 in practical situations. At times, user reviews, such as those published at amazon, address these issues in a useful fashion, just such feedback is on many occasions incomplete, inconsistent, and unreliable.

Good reviews

This is where reviews by experts come in. The adjacent summary-table relays the overall verdicts of several of the most popular photographic camera review sites (amateurphotographer [AP], cameralabs [CL], digitalcameraworld [DCW], dpreview [DPR], ephotozine [EPZ], photographyblog [PB]). As can be seen, the professional reviewers concord in many cases on the quality of different cameras, but sometimes their assessments diverge, reinforcing the earlier bespeak that a camera decision is often a very personal choice.

Expert Camera Reviews

		Photographic camera  Model	AP  score	CL  score	DCW  score	DPR  score	EPZ  score	PB  score	Camera Launch	Launch Cost (USD)	Street Price
1.		Catechism 5D Mark II	iv/5	91/100	..	79/100	4/5	..	Sep 2008	3,499	ebay.com
2.		Sony A7	five/v	+ +	..	80/100	5/5	5/5	Oct 2013	i,699	ebay.com
3.		Canon 1D Ten Mark Two	..	..	4.5/5	89/100	4.5/5	iv.5/v	February 2016	5,999	ebay.com
iv.		Canon 5D Marker IV	iv.5/v	+ +	four/5	87/100	four.5/5	4.v/v	Aug 2016	3,499	amazon.com
five.		Canon 5DS	..	+	..	83/100	iv.5/5	four.five/5	February 2015	3,699	amazon.com
6.		Canon 5DS R	five/five	+	..	83/100	v/5	iv.5/five	February 2015	3,699	amazon.com
7.		Canon 5D Mark III	..	+ +	..	82/100	4.v/5	four.5/5	Mar 2012	3,499	ebay.com
8.		Canon 6D	5/five	+ +	..	83/100	4.5/5	four.5/5	Sep 2012	2,099	ebay.com
9.		Catechism 1D X	5/5	..	..	..	four.five/v	4.five/five	Oct 2011	vi,799	ebay.com
ten.		Catechism 7D	5/5	+ +	..	84/100	4.five/5	4.5/5	Sep 2009	1,699	ebay.com
11.		Canon 1Ds Mark Three	..	..	..	+ +	4.v/five	..	Aug 2007	seven,999	ebay.com
12.		Canon 5D	..	88/100	..	+ +	o	..	Aug 2005	3,299	ebay.com
13.		Sony A7 II	5/v	+	iv/5	82/100	4.5/5	5/v	Nov 2014	1,999	ebay.com
14.		Sony A7S	4/v	..	..	86/100	iv.5/5	5/v	Apr 2014	2,499	ebay.com
15.		Sony A7R	5/v	+ +	..	82/100	4.5/5	v/5	October 2013	2,299	ebay.com
sixteen.		Sony RX1R	5/five	..	..	..	iv/v	4.5/5	Jun 2013	2,799	ebay.com
17.		Sony RX1	5/5	..	..	79/100	4/5	4.5/5	Sep 2012	2,799	ebay.com
Notes: (+ +) highly recommended; (+) recommended; (o) reviewed; (..) not available.

The higher up review scores should be interpreted with care, though. The assessments were made in relation to similar cameras of the same technological generation. Thus, a score needs to be put into the context of the launch date and the launch price of the camera, and comparisons of ratings among very different cameras or across long time periods accept lilliputian significant. As well, kindly note that some of the listed sites take over time developped their review approaches and their reporting style.

Check 5D Mark II offers at
ebay.com
Bank check A7 offers at
ebay.com

Other camera comparisons

Did this review help to inform your camera decision procedure? If y'all would like to see a different side-past-side photographic camera review, just make a corresponding selection in the search boxes beneath. Equally an alternative, you can also directly spring to any one of the listed comparisons that were previously generated by the CAM-parator tool.

• Canon 5D Marker Two vs Canon 5DS
• Canon 5D Marker II vs Canon T2i
• Canon 5D Mark 2 vs Leica M10-P
• Canon 5D Mark Two vs Leica X Vario
• Canon 5D Mark II vs Olympus E-600
• Canon 5D Mark II vs Sony A7S Ii
• Canon XC10 vs Sony A7
• Fujifilm GFX 50R vs Sony A7
• Olympus E-P7 vs Sony A7
• Panasonic GF3 vs Sony A7
• Panasonic TS7 vs Sony A7
• Sony A7 vs Sony A850

Specifications: Canon 5D Mark Two vs Sony A7

Beneath is a side-by-side comparison of the specs of the two cameras to facilitate a quick review of their differences and common features.

Camera Specifications

Photographic camera Model	Catechism 5D Mark II	Sony A7
Camera Type	Digital single lens reflex	Mirrorless system camera
Camera Lens	Catechism EF mount lenses	Sony E mountain lenses
Launch Date	September 2008	October 2013
Launch Cost	USD three,499	USD 1,699
Sensor Specs	Canon 5D Marker Two	Sony A7
Sensor Engineering science	CMOS	CMOS
Sensor Format	Full Frame Sensor	Total Frame Sensor
Sensor Size	36.0 ten 24.0 mm	35.eight x 23.9 mm
Sensor Area	864 mmtwo	855.62 mm2
Sensor Diagonal	43.three mm	43 mm
Crop Factor	1.0x	1.0x
Sensor Resolution	21 Megapixels	24 Megapixels
Paradigm Resolution	5616 x 3744 pixels	6000 10 4000 pixels
Pixel Pitch	6.41 μm	5.97 μm
Pixel Density	2.43 MP/cm2	ii.80 MP/cm2
Moiré command	Anti-Alias filter	Anti-Allonym filter
Movie Adequacy	1080/30p Video	1080/60p Video
ISO Setting	100 - half-dozen,400 ISO	100 - 25,600 ISO
ISO Boost	50 - 25,600 ISO	50 - 51,200 ISO
Epitome Processor	DIGIC four	BIONZ 10
DXO Sensor Quality (score)	79	90
DXO Color Depth (bits)	23.vii	24.eight
DXO Dynamic Range (EV)	11.9	14.2
DXO Depression Light (ISO)	1815	2248
Screen Specs	Canon 5D Mark II	Sony A7
Viewfinder Blazon	Optical viewfinder	Electronic viewfinder
Viewfinder Field of View	98%	100%
Viewfinder Magnification	0.71x	0.71x
Viewfinder Resolution		2400k dots
Peak-Level Screen	Control Panel	no Top Display
LCD Framing	Live View	Live View
Rear LCD Size	three.0inch	iii.0inch
LCD Resolution	920k dots	1230k dots
LCD Attachment	Fixed screen	Tilting screen
Shooting Specs	Canon 5D Mark II	Sony A7
Focus Organisation	Phase-detect AF	On-Sensor Phase-find
Transmission Focusing Aid	no Peaking Feature	Focus Peaking
Max Shutter Speed (mechanical)	i/8000s	1/8000s
Continuous Shooting	3.9 shutter flaps/s	5 shutter flaps/s
Fill Wink	no On-Board Wink	no On-Board Flash
Storage Medium	CF cards	MS or SDXC cards
Second Storage Option	Single card slot	Single bill of fare slot
Connectivity Specs	Canon 5D Mark 2	Sony A7
External Flash	Hotshoe	Hotshoe
Studio Flash	PC Sync socket	no PC Sync
USB Connector	USB 2.0	USB 2.0
HDMI Port	mini HDMI	micro HDMI
Microphone Port	External MIC port	External MIC port
Headphone Socket	no Headphone port	Headphone port
Wifi Support	no Wifi	Wifi built-in
Near-Field Advice	no NFC	NFC built-in
Body Specs	Canon 5D Mark II	Sony A7
Ecology Sealing	Weathersealed trunk	Weathersealed trunk
Battery Type	LP-E6	NP-FW50
Bombardment Life (CIPA)	850 shots per charge	340 shots per charge
In-Camera Charging	no USB charging	USB charging
Torso Dimensions	152 10 114 x 75 mm (6.0 10 4.5 ten 3.0 in)	127 x 94 10 48 mm (5.0 x three.seven x ane.nine in)
Camera Weight	850 g (30.0 oz)	474 grand (16.7 oz)

Check 5D Marker II offers at
ebay.com
Check A7 offers at
ebay.com

Did y'all notice an fault on this page? If so, please go in touch, and then that nosotros tin correct the information.

bednarzafection.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.apotelyt.com/compare-camera/canon-5d-mark-ii-vs-sony-a7

Share this post